[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1de8055-89a7-25dd-d99a-427e2c2c4c59@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:28:54 -0700
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, sashal@...nel.org,
jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] KEYS: Defined an ima hook for measuring keys on
key create or update
On 10/25/2019 12:40 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> +void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
>> + unsigned long flags, bool create)
>> +{
>> + const struct public_key *pk;
>> +
>> + if (key->type != &key_type_asymmetric)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (!ima_initialized)
>> + return;
>
> There's no reason to define a new variable to determine if IMA is
> initialized. Use ima_policy_flag.
Please correct me if I am wrong -
ima_policy_flag will be set to 0 if IMA is not yet initialized
OR
IMA is initialized, but ima_policy_flag could be still set to 0 (say,
due to the configured policy).
In the latter case the measurement request should be a NOP immediately.
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists