[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bb4356-136b-b395-894e-8cffa1709309@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:47:25 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID
allocator with IOASID
Hi,
On 10/25/19 3:54 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Make use of generic IOASID code to manage PASID allocation,
> free, and lookup. Replace Intel specific code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 36 ------------------------------------
> drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
[--cut--]
> @@ -458,10 +465,11 @@ int intel_svm_is_pasid_valid(struct device *dev, int pasid)
> if (!iommu)
> goto out;
>
> - svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(pasid);
> - if (!svm)
> + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(svm)) {
Shall we check whether svm is NULL?
Others looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists