[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201910250833.IlbJgJPZ%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:50:27 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] input: adp5589: Make keypad support optional
Hi Alexandru,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on input/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.4-rc4]
[cannot apply to next-20191024]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Alexandru-Ardelean/input-adp5589-Make-keypad-support-optional/20191025-034654
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git next
config: x86_64-kexec (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:575:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
^~~~~
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:581:9: error: expected '{' before 'const'
struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
^~~~~
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1049:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_add'; did you mean 'adp5589_keypad_add'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
error = adp5589_gpio_add(kpad, pdata);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
adp5589_keypad_add
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_remove':
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1074:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'adp5589_gpio_remove'; did you mean 'adp5589_remove'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
adp5589_gpio_remove(kpad, pdata);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
adp5589_remove
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c: In function 'adp5589_probe':
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1019:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kpad->support_row5 = true;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c:1020:2: note: here
case ADP5585_01:
^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +575 drivers/input/keyboard/adp5589-keys.c
552
553 static void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
554 const struct adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
555 {
556 struct device *dev = &kpad->client->dev;
557 const struct adp5589_gpio_platform_data *gpio_data = pdata->gpio_data;
558 int error;
559
560 if (!kpad->export_gpio)
561 return;
562
563 if (gpio_data->teardown) {
564 error = gpio_data->teardown(kpad->client,
565 kpad->gc.base, kpad->gc.ngpio,
566 gpio_data->context);
567 if (error)
568 dev_warn(dev, "teardown failed %d\n", error);
569 }
570
571 gpiochip_remove(&kpad->gc);
572 }
573 #else
574 static inline int adp5589_gpio_add(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
> 575 struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
576 {
577 return 0;
578 }
579
580 static inline void adp5589_gpio_remove(struct adp5589_kpad *kpad,
> 581 struct const adp5589_kpad_platform_data *pdata)
582 {
583 }
584 #endif
585
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (27445 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists