[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <085bdbc4-4845-a3ae-d8f3-bf4f2d753226@st.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:17:52 +0000
From: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@...com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Peppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: ethernet: stmmac: some fixes and optimization
Hi all,
Just a "gentleman ping" about this series
Regards,
Christophe.
On 9/23/19 9:46 AM, Christophe ROULLIER wrote:
> Hi Jakub, all,
>
> It is not urgent, no problem to wait next merge window (release 5.5)
>
> For patch 1 and 3, it is improvement/cleanup because now syscfg clock
> is not mandatory (I put code backward compatible).
>
> Regards,
>
> Christophe
>
> On 9/23/19 12:12 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 07:38:12 +0200, Christophe Roullier wrote:
>>> Some improvements (manage syscfg as optional clock, update slew rate of
>>> ETH_MDIO pin, Enable gating of the MAC TX clock during TX low-power
>>> mode)
>>> Fix warning build message when W=1
>> There seems to be some new features/cleanups (or improvements as
>> you say) here. Could you explain the negative impact not applying
>> these changes will have? Patches 1 and 3 in particular.
>>
>> net-next is now closed [1], and will reopen some time after the merge
>> window is over. For now we are only expecting fixes for the net tree.
>>
>> Could you (a) provide stronger motivation these changes are fixes; or
>> (b) separate the fixes from improvements?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists