linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add link to stm32mp157 docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <433bfc27-14cd-cf19-8460-7fd5230aaa55@st.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:42:05 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Gerald BAEZA <gerald.baeza@...com>
CC:     "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add link to stm32mp157 docs

Hi Jonathan

On 10/7/19 5:32 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:05:46 +0000
> Gerald BAEZA <gerald.baeza@...com> wrote:
> 
>>>> Adding the URL is a fine idea.  But you don't need the extra syntax to
>>>> create a link if you're not going to actually make a link out of it.
>>>> So I'd take the ".. _STM32MP157:" part out and life will be good.
>>>>   
>>>
>>> We also did it for older stm32 product. Idea was to not have the "full"
>>> address but just a shortcut of the link when html file is read. It maybe makes
>>> no sens ? (if yes we will have to update older stm32 overview :))
>>
>> Example in https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm/stm32/stm32h743-overview.html
>>
>> Do you agree to continue like this ?
> 
> If you actually use the reference then it's OK, I guess; in the posted
> document that wasn't happening.  I still think it might be a bit more
> straightforward to just put the URL; that will make the plain-text file a
> little more readable.  In the end, though, it's up to you, go with
> whichever you prefer.
> 

Do you take this patch or do I have to add it in my STM32 pull request ?

Thanks in advance
Alex


> Thanks,
> 
> jon
>