[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191025100542.licpieymkbsbm5cd@M43218.corp.atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:05:43 +0200
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>, <peda@...ntia.se>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] i2c: add support for filters
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 08:30:35PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:24:14AM +0000, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
> > From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds support for analog and digital filters for i2c controllers
> >
> > This series is based on the series:
> > [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: at91: filters support for at91 SoCs
> > and later
> > [PATCH v4 0/9] i2c: add support for filters
> > and enhanced to add the bindings for all controllers plus an extra bindings
> > for the width of the spikes in nanoseconds (digital filters) and cut-off
> > frequency (analog filters)
> >
> > First, bindings are created for
> > 'i2c-analog-filter'
> > 'i2c-digital-filter'
> > 'i2c-digital-filter-width-ns'
> > 'i2c-analog-filter-cutoff-frequency'
> >
> > The support is added in the i2c core to retrieve filter width/cutoff frequency
> > and add it to the timings structure.
> > Next, the at91 driver is enhanced for supporting digital filter, advanced
> > digital filter (with selectable spike width) and the analog filter.
> >
> > Finally the device tree for two boards are modified to make use of the
> > new properties.
> >
> > This series is the result of the comments on the ML in the direction
> > requested: to make the bindings globally available for i2c drivers.
>
> Applied patches 1-7 to for-next (patch 3 is v6). Thanks for your
> patience and thanks to Ludovic and Peter for the review! Patches 8-9
> should go via the at91 tree.
>
Thanks, patch 8 and 9 applied to at91-dt.
Regards
Ludovic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists