linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:06:12 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:43:00AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> But none of that explains why apply_alternatives() is also delayed.
> 
> So I'm very tempted to just revert that patchset for doing it all
> wrong.

And I've done just that. This includes Josh's validation patch, the
revert and my klp_appy_relocations_add() patches with the removal of
module_disable_ro().

Josh, can you test or give me clue on how to test? I need to run a few
errands today, but I'll try and have a poke either tonight or tomorrow.

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/rwx

After this it is waiting for Mark's argh64 patches to land:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021163426.9408-5-mark.rutland@arm.com

And then we can go and delete module_disable_ro() entirely -- hooray!