linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf/core: fix restoring of Intel LBR call stack on a context switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ce22287-3bba-a95f-abe4-ba823af1dda0@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:53:53 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf/core: fix restoring of Intel LBR call stack
 on a context switch

On 25.10.2019 12:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:35:46AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> Is this the exact same version again? ISTR already having seen (and
> picked up for testing) a v5.

Observed the v5 committed to kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core.
Thanks for you support!

~Alexey