linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: qlge: Rename prefix of a function to qlge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191025145554.GB7244@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:55:54 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Samuil Ivanov <samuil.ivanovbg@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, manishc@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: qlge: Rename prefix of a function to qlge

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:28:42PM +0300, Samuil Ivanov wrote:
> Dan you are correct it is a bit of a hodge podge :)
> I think that it is better to have a bigger patches that will rename
> more functions, but I don't this it is good to have all the
> functions renamed in one patch.
> 
> Just in the header file I counted around 55 function definitions,
> and in the source files there are some more.
> So that will make one huge patch.
> 

I don't really have a problem if you rename everything at once.  Or if
you want to rename all of them in a 55 patch patchset that's also fine
with me...

regards,
dan carpenter