lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191025162225.139691-1-lkundrak@v3.sk>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:22:25 +0200
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Subject: [PATCH] iscsi_ibft: Don't limits Targets and NICs to two

According to iSCSI Boot Firmware Table Version 1.03 [1], the length of
the control table is ">= 18", where the optional expansion structure
pointer follow the mandatory ones. This allows for more than two NICs
and Targets.

[1] ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/systems/support/bladecenter/iscsi_boot_firmware_table_v1.03.pdf

Let's enforce the minimum length of the control structure instead
instead of limiting it to the smallest allowed size.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
---
 drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
index 7e12cbdf957cc..fa8bca6910050 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct ibft_control {
 	u16 tgt0_off;
 	u16 nic1_off;
 	u16 tgt1_off;
+	u16 expansion[0];
 } __attribute__((__packed__));
 
 struct ibft_initiator {
@@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ static int ibft_verify_hdr(char *t, struct ibft_hdr *hdr, int id, int length)
 				"found %d instead!\n", t, id, hdr->id);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
-	if (hdr->length != length) {
+	if (length && hdr->length != length) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "iBFT error: We expected the %s " \
 				"field header.length to have %d but " \
 				"found %d instead!\n", t, length, hdr->length);
@@ -749,11 +750,11 @@ static int __init ibft_register_kobjects(struct acpi_table_ibft *header)
 	control = (void *)header + sizeof(*header);
 	end = (void *)control + control->hdr.length;
 	eot_offset = (void *)header + header->header.length - (void *)control;
-	rc = ibft_verify_hdr("control", (struct ibft_hdr *)control, id_control,
-			     sizeof(*control));
+	rc = ibft_verify_hdr("control", (struct ibft_hdr *)control, id_control, 0);
 
 	/* iBFT table safety checking */
 	rc |= ((control->hdr.index) ? -ENODEV : 0);
+	rc |= ((control->hdr.length < sizeof(*control)) ? -ENODEV : 0);
 	if (rc) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "iBFT error: Control header is invalid!\n");
 		return rc;
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ