[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191026132217.4380-15-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 09:22:11 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 15/21] hrtimer: Annotate lockless access to timer->base
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit ff229eee3d897f52bd001c841f2d3cce8853ecdc ]
Followup to commit dd2261ed45aa ("hrtimer: Protect lockless access
to timer->base")
lock_hrtimer_base() fetches timer->base without lock exclusion.
Compiler is allowed to read timer->base twice (even if considered dumb)
which could end up trying to lock migration_base and return
&migration_base.
base = timer->base;
if (likely(base != &migration_base)) {
/* compiler reads timer->base again, and now (base == &migration_base)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base->cpu_base->lock, *flags);
if (likely(base == timer->base))
return base; /* == &migration_base ! */
Similarly the write sides must use WRITE_ONCE() to avoid store tearing.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191008173204.180879-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index c93729661be0e..6be150f16539b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct hrtimer_clock_base *lock_hrtimer_base(const struct hrtimer *timer,
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
for (;;) {
- base = timer->base;
+ base = READ_ONCE(timer->base);
if (likely(base != &migration_base)) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&base->cpu_base->lock, *flags);
if (likely(base == timer->base))
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
return base;
/* See the comment in lock_hrtimer_base() */
- timer->base = &migration_base;
+ WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, &migration_base);
raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
@@ -241,10 +241,10 @@ switch_hrtimer_base(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
new_cpu_base = this_cpu_base;
- timer->base = base;
+ WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, base);
goto again;
}
- timer->base = new_base;
+ WRITE_ONCE(timer->base, new_base);
} else {
if (new_cpu_base != this_cpu_base &&
hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists