[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bec85427-66b8-e0fa-9ee2-07cc77cf4a7e@web.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 07:55:15 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: aspeed-video: Fix memory leaks in
aspeed_video_probe
…
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
> @@ -1663,18 +1663,24 @@ static int aspeed_video_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
…
> +free_video:
> + kfree(video);
…
I am curious if there is a need for such a memory release at another place.
How do you think about to add this function call also to the implementation
of the function “aspeed_video_remove”?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists