[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191027203354.035458609@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 21:59:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 043/197] RISC-V: Clear load reservations while restoring hart contexts
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
[ Upstream commit 18856604b3e7090ce42d533995173ee70c24b1c9 ]
This is almost entirely a comment. The bug is unlikely to manifest on
existing hardware because there is a timeout on load reservations, but
manifests on QEMU because there is no timeout.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
index 5a02b7d509408..9c992a88d858f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#define REG_L __REG_SEL(ld, lw)
#define REG_S __REG_SEL(sd, sw)
+#define REG_SC __REG_SEL(sc.d, sc.w)
#define SZREG __REG_SEL(8, 4)
#define LGREG __REG_SEL(3, 2)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
index 9b60878a4469c..2a82e0a5af46e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
@@ -98,7 +98,26 @@ _save_context:
*/
.macro RESTORE_ALL
REG_L a0, PT_SSTATUS(sp)
- REG_L a2, PT_SEPC(sp)
+ /*
+ * The current load reservation is effectively part of the processor's
+ * state, in the sense that load reservations cannot be shared between
+ * different hart contexts. We can't actually save and restore a load
+ * reservation, so instead here we clear any existing reservation --
+ * it's always legal for implementations to clear load reservations at
+ * any point (as long as the forward progress guarantee is kept, but
+ * we'll ignore that here).
+ *
+ * Dangling load reservations can be the result of taking a trap in the
+ * middle of an LR/SC sequence, but can also be the result of a taken
+ * forward branch around an SC -- which is how we implement CAS. As a
+ * result we need to clear reservations between the last CAS and the
+ * jump back to the new context. While it is unlikely the store
+ * completes, implementations are allowed to expand reservations to be
+ * arbitrarily large.
+ */
+ REG_L a2, PT_SEPC(sp)
+ REG_SC x0, a2, PT_SEPC(sp)
+
csrw CSR_SSTATUS, a0
csrw CSR_SEPC, a2
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists