linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMz4kuJAwV7f=pjUqs1nO3+L5NbcwCQrCi-HGUPPXgp7rWUs=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:27:09 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        baolin.wang7@...il.com, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops

Hi Adrian,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 22/10/19 8:58 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops as a preparation in case some
> > host controllers have different method to complete one request, such as
> > supporting request completion of MMC software queue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > index b056400..850241f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > @@ -2729,7 +2729,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
> >
> >       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> >
> > -     mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> > +     if (host->ops->request_done)
> > +             host->ops->request_done(host, mrq);
>
> For hsq, couldn't this result in sdhci_request() being called interrupt
> context here.

Right, now it did not support.

>
> To prevent that you would need to add a condition to sdhci_defer_done() so
> it always defers when using hsq.

Yes, but now the condition can be matched in sdhci_defer_done()  when
using hsq. So no need to worry that the sdhci_request() will be called
in interrupt
context in this patch set. Thanks.

-- 
Baolin Wang
Best Regards