[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191028162525.GF5576@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:25:26 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jeyu@...nel.org,
rabin@....in, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
james.morse@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] arm/ftrace: Use __patch_text_real()
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:35:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Instead of flipping text protection, use the patch_text infrastructure
> that uses a fixmap alias where required.
>
> This removes the last user of set_all_modules_text_*().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
> Cc: rabin@....in
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: james.morse@....com
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <asm/ftrace.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <asm/set_memory.h>
> +#include <asm/patch.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> #define NOP 0xf85deb04 /* pop.w {lr} */
> @@ -31,13 +32,15 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>
> +static int patch_text_remap = 0;
> +
> static int __ftrace_modify_code(void *data)
> {
> int *command = data;
>
> - set_kernel_text_rw();
> + patch_text_remap++;
> ftrace_modify_all_code(*command);
> - set_kernel_text_ro();
> + patch_text_remap--;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -59,13 +62,13 @@ static unsigned long adjust_address(stru
>
> int ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(void)
> {
> - set_all_modules_text_rw();
> + patch_text_remap++;
> return 0;
> }
>
> int ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process(void)
> {
> - set_all_modules_text_ro();
> + patch_text_remap--;
> /* Make sure any TLB misses during machine stop are cleared. */
> flush_tlb_all();
> return 0;
> @@ -97,10 +100,7 @@ static int ftrace_modify_code(unsigned l
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (probe_kernel_write((void *)pc, &new, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE))
> - return -EPERM;
> -
> - flush_icache_range(pc, pc + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> + __patch_text_real((void *)pc, new, patch_text_remap);
Why can't you just pass 'true' for patch_text_remap? AFAICT, the only
time you want to pass false is during early boot when the text is
assumedly still writable without the fixmap.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists