linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: replace g_free_fragments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191028190804.GG1944@kadam>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:08:04 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        eric@...olt.net, wahrenst@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: replace g_free_fragments_mutex
 with spinlock

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > This is obviously not in a format I can apply it in :(
> 
> What are you talking about? I sent you the original patch,
> then Cc'ed the drivers mailing list.  So you still have a
> patch you can apply... this is quite a common way of doing
> things (Ccing for future references to someone or another
> ml). I don't understand why you are hairsplitting over this
> patch.
> 

I don't have the original patch either.  Only the corrupted one...  Maybe
you did it as html and it was rejected?

regards,
dan carpenter