[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191028031459.GI16985@dragon>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:15:00 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"ccaione@...libre.com" <ccaione@...libre.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"jon@...id-run.com" <jon@...id-run.com>,
"baruch@...s.co.il" <baruch@...s.co.il>,
"angus@...ea.ca" <angus@...ea.ca>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"agx@...xcpu.org" <agx@...xcpu.org>,
Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>,
"dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com" <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>,
Richard Hu <richard.hu@...hnexion.com>,
"andradanciu1997@...il.com" <andradanciu1997@...il.com>,
"manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move usdhc clocks assignment to
board DT
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:29:32AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Shawn
>
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:14:23AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > usdhc's clock rate is different according to different devices
> > > connected, so clock rate assignment should be placed in board DT
> > > according to different devices connected on each usdhc port.
> >
> > I think it should be fine that we have a reasonable default settings in soc.dtsi,
> > and boards that need a different setup can overwrite the settings in
> > board.dts.
>
> Someone was complaining about the usdhc clock assignment in soc.dtsi, because some
> usdhc nodes are having clock assignments while some are NOT. That is why I did this
> patch set. I agree that we can have default settings in soc.dtsi, so do you think it makes
> sense to add default clock assignment to all usdhc nodes? If yes, I will redo the patch
> set.
I had a second thought on this. To ease the maintenance of soc.dtsi,
let's do clock assignments in board.dts.
Series applied, thanks.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists