[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029180233.GA587491@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:02:33 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.81 release.
> > There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton
> > Subject: Linux 4.19.81
>
> > [-- The following data is signed --]
>
> > I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.81 kernel.
>
> > All users of the 4.19 kernel series must upgrade.
>
> Am I confused or was the 4.19.81 released a bit early?
I said:
Responses should be made by Tue 29 Oct 2019 08:27:02 PM UTC.
And I released at:
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:19:29 +0100
So really, I was a few minutes late :)
I generally just wait for the big testers to come back with responses.
If I have all of them looking good, I often times release early
depending on what is happening with my travel and other things. But
this time, I actually took the whole time I said I would.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists