lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029201513.GG1208@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:15:13 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: khugepaged might_sleep() warn due to CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y

Hi,

I got some khugepaged spew on a 32bit x86:

[  217.490026] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/mmu_notifier.h:346
[  217.492826] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 25, name: khugepaged
[  217.495589] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  217.498371] CPU: 1 PID: 25 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 5.4.0-rc5-elk+ #206
[  217.501233] Hardware name: System manufacturer P5Q-EM/P5Q-EM, BIOS 2203    07/08/2009
[  217.501697] Call Trace:
[  217.501697]  dump_stack+0x66/0x8e
[  217.501697]  ___might_sleep.cold.96+0x95/0xa6
[  217.501697]  __might_sleep+0x2e/0x80
[  217.501697]  collapse_huge_page.isra.51+0x5ac/0x1360
[  217.501697]  ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xec/0xf80
[  217.501697]  ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x191/0xf80
[  217.501697]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4a/0xf0
[  217.501697]  khugepaged+0x9a9/0x20f0
[  217.501697]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x21/0x30
[  217.501697]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4a/0xf0
[  217.501697]  ? wait_woken+0xa0/0xa0
[  217.501697]  kthread+0xf5/0x110
[  217.501697]  ? collapse_pte_mapped_thp+0x3b0/0x3b0
[  217.501697]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x20/0x20
[  217.501697]  ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x38

Looks like it's due to CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y pte_offset_map()->kmap_atomic() vs.
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start().

My naive idea would be to just reorder those things, but not sure
if there's some magic ordering constraint here. At least the machine
still boots when I do it :)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 0a1b4b484ac5..f05d27b7183d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1028,12 +1028,13 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma);
 
-	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
-	pte_ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
-
 	mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, NULL, mm,
 				address, address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
+
+	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
+	pte_ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+
 	pmd_ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); /* probably unnecessary */
 	/*
 	 * After this gup_fast can't run anymore. This also removes

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ