[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53fc01bf9ef25012a1a43b87954b62a02101d85c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:13:30 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "Force HWP min perf before offline" triggers unchecked MSR
access errors
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 18:01 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2019, at 5:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > The MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS MSR appears to be not present, which
> > should be caught by the X86_FEATURE_EPB check in
> > intel_pstate_set_epb().
> >
> > Do you run this in a guest perchance?
>
> No, it is a baremetal HPE server. The dmesg does say something like
> energy perf bias changed from performance to normal, and the cpuflag
> contains epb which I thought that would pass the feature check? I
> could upload the whole dmesg a bit later if that helps.
Try the attached change. You have a Skylake server with no EPP support.
This is odd.
Thanks,
Srinivas
View attachment "epb_power.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (1025 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists