[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66c69519-6717-8c2e-dc92-05448535c181@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:39:23 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: dts: realtek: Change dual-license from MIT
to BSD
Am 25.10.19 um 22:52 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:08 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>>
>> Move the SPDX-License-Identifier to the top line and update to SPDX 2.0.
>> While at it, switch from GPLv2+/MIT to GPLv2+/BSD2c before adding more.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
>> v2: New
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1295-zidoo-x9s.dts | 3 +--
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd1295.dtsi | 3 +--
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd129x.dtsi | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> It's really only schema files that I'm pushing towards BSD2C. Maybe in
> hindsight we should have done MIT as that's more common in the dts
> files.
After discussion with Rob about whether to drop this change I dropped
the misunderstood Suggested-by and applied this to linux-realtek.git
v5.5/dt64 anyway:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/afaerber/linux-realtek.git/log/?h=v5.5/dt64
I don't mind either license.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists