[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029054620.GG1929@tuxbook-pro>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:46:20 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: cang@...eaurora.org
Cc: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: Add command logging infrastructure
On Mon 28 Oct 19:37 PDT 2019, cang@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-10-23 18:33, Avri Altman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add the necessary infrastructure to keep timestamp history of
> > > > commands, events and other useful info for debugging complex issues.
> > > > This helps in diagnosing events leading upto failure.
> > >
> > > Why not use tracepoints, for that?
> > Ack on Tomas's comment.
> > Are there any pieces of information that you need not provided by the
> > upiu tracer?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Avri
>
> In extreme cases, when the UFS runs into bad state, system may crash. There
> may not be a chance to collect trace. If trace is not collected and failure
> is hard to be reproduced, some command logs prints would be very helpful to
> help understand what was going on before we run into failure.
>
This is a common problem shared among many/all subsystems, so it's
better to rely on a generic solution for this; such as using tracepoints
dumped into pstore/ramoops.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists