linux-kernel - Re: Please add the zuf tree to linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191029055359.GA30787@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:53:59 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please add the zuf tree to linux-next

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:07:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Please add the zuf tree below to the linux-next tree.
> > > 	[https://github.com/NetApp/zufs-zuf zuf]  
> > 
> > I don't remember us coming to the conclusion that this actually is
> > useful doesn't just badly duplicate the fuse functionality.
> 
> So is that a hard Nak on inclusion in linux-next at this time?

As far as I'm concerned yes.  In the end we'll need to find rough
consensus as I'm not the only one to decide, though.