[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910290706360.3769@www.lameter.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user
mappings
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Setting a single 4k page non-present in the direct mapping will require
> splitting 2M or 1G page we usually map direct mapping with. And it's one
> way road. We don't have any mechanism to map the memory with huge page
> again after the application has freed the page.
>
> It might be okay if all these pages cluster together, but I don't think we
> have a way to achieve it easily.
Set aside a special physical memory range for this and migrate the
page to that physical memory range when MAP_EXCLUSIVE is specified?
Maybe some processors also have hardware ranges that offer additional
protection for stuff like that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists