[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029111517.GE11590@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:15:17 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
Dave.Martin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: Export Armv8.6 Matrix feature to
userspace
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:10:56PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> This patch provides support for reporting the presence of Armv8.6
> Matrix and its optional features to userspace.
Are you sure this is 8.6 and not earlier?
> This based on [1] + commit ec52c7134b1f "arm64: cpufeature: Treat
> ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 as RAZ when SVE is not enabled" (taken from v5.4-rc4).
>
> [1] arm64/for-next/elf-hwcap-docs
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst | 8 ++++++++
> Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 4 ++++
> 7 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst b/Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst
> index ffcf4e2c71ef..d1d6d56a7b08 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst
> @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ infrastructure:
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> | Name | bits | visible |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | I8MM | [52-55] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
Looking at:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0601/latest/aarch64-system-registers/id_aa64isar1_el1
Then I8MM is advertised as "Armv8.2", alongside other fields that we haven't
listed here such as BF16 and SPECRES.
So we probably want a patch bringing all of this up to speed, rather than
randomly advertising some features and not others.
> | SB | [36-39] | y |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> | FRINTTS | [32-35] | y |
> @@ -227,6 +229,12 @@ infrastructure:
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> | Name | bits | visible |
> +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | F64MM | [56-59] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | F32MM | [52-55] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> + | I8MM | [44-47] | y |
> + +------------------------------+---------+---------+
Urgh, we're inconsistent in our bitfields. Some are [lo-hi] whilst others
are [hi-lo]. Please can you fix that in a preparatory patch? I prefer
[hi-lo] and it matches the arch docs.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists