[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029123949.GL4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:39:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, thomas.lendacky@....com
Subject: AMD TLB errata, (Was: [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create
exclusive user mappings)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:24PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:56:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:43:18AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > But some CPUs don't like to have two TLB entries for the same memory with
> > > different sizes at the same time. See for instance AMD erratum 383.
> > >
> > > Getting it right would require making the range not present, flush TLB and
> > > only then install huge page. That's what we do for userspace.
> > >
> > > It will not fly for the direct mapping. There is no reasonable way to
> > > exclude other CPU from accessing the range while it's not present (call
> > > stop_machine()? :P). Moreover, the range may contain the code that doing
> > > the collapse or data required for it...
> > >
> > > BTW, looks like current __split_large_page() in pageattr.c is susceptible
> > > to the errata. Maybe we can get away with the easy way...
> >
> > As you write above, there is just no way we can have a (temporary) hole
> > in the direct map.
> >
> > We are careful about that other errata, and make sure both translations
> > are identical wrt everything else.
>
> It's not clear if it is enough to avoid the issue. "under a highly specific
> and detailed set of conditions" is not very specific set of conditions :P
Yeah, I know ... :/ Tom is there any chance you could shed a little more
light on that errata?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists