[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029125519.GA1705@kadam>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:55:19 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.co>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:47:50PM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:50:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > +static void match_of_get_property(const char *fn, struct expression *expr, void *unused)
> > +{
> > + struct expression *left = expr->left;
> > + struct symbol *type;
> > +
> > + type = get_type(left);
> > + if (!type || type->type != SYM_PTR)
> > + return;
> > + type = get_base_type(type);
> > + if (type_bits(type) == 8)
> > + return;
> > + if (type->type == SYM_RESTRICT)
> > + return;
>
> Wouldn't this also silently accept assignments to any bitwise
> type: __le32, __be16, ... ?
It does, yes. I'm not sure how big of an issue that is... I always
just throw a check together and test it before I decide if it's worth
investing more time into it.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists