[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029133724.GI508460@ulmo>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:37:24 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] soc/tegra: pmc: Remove unnecessary memory barrier
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:17:55PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The removed barrier isn't needed because writes/reads are strictly ordered
> and even if PMC had separate ports for writes, it wouldn't matter since
> the hardware logic takes into effect after triggering CPU's power-gating
> and at that point all CPU accesses are guaranteed to be completed. That
> barrier was copied from the old arch/ code during transition to the soc/
> PMC driver and even that the code structure was different back then, the
> barrier didn't have a real useful purpose from the start. Lastly, the
> tegra_pmc_writel() naturally inserts wmb() because it uses writel(),
> and thus this change doesn't actually make any difference in terms of
> interacting with hardware. Hence let's remove the barrier to clean up
> code a tad.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
>
> v5: Extended the commit's message.
>
> v4: No changes.
>
> v3: No changes.
>
> v2: New patch that was added after Jon's Hunter pointing that it's better
> not to change the barrier's placement in the code. In fact the barrier
> is not needed at all.
>
> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Applied to for-5.5/soc, thanks.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists