lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191029134246.GA4943@saurav>
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:12:46 +0530
From:   SAURAV GIREPUNJE <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        saurav.girepunje@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: kvm: mmu.c: use true/false for bool type

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:13:00AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 03:11:04PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> > Use true/false for bool type "dbg" in mmu.c
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 24c23c66b226..c0b1df69ce0f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum {
> >  #undef MMU_DEBUG
> >  
> >  #ifdef MMU_DEBUG
> > -static bool dbg = 0;
> > +static bool dbg = true;
> 
> You're actually changing the value from false to true. Please, if you
> don't know C, don't touch things.
Hi,

Thanks for your review.
I accept that I have given wrong value "true" to debug variable. It's my bad my typo mistake.  
I will make sure that I will not touch your exclusive C code where we can assign 0/1 to a bool variable,
As you have given me a free advice, I also request you to please don't review such small patches from newbie to discourage them.

Regards,
Saurav

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ