lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tv7rlgdh.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:29:30 -0500
From:   Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Kamalesh Babulal <kamaleshb@...ibm.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] pseries/hotplug: Change the default behaviour of cede_offline

Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:03:26PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > This is the v2 of the fix to change the default behaviour of
>> > cede_offline.
>> 
>> OK, but why keep the cede offline behavior at all? Can we remove it? I
>> think doing so would allow us to remove all the code that temporarily
>> onlines threads for partition migration.
>
> May be I am missing something. But don't we want all the CPUs to come
> online and execute the H_JOIN hcall before performing partition
> migration? How will this change whether the offlined CPUs are in
> H_CEDE or rtas-stop-self?

The platform considers threads in H_CEDE to be active. It considers
threads that have performed stop-self to be inactive until they have
been restarted. The Thread Join Option section of the PAPR says active
threads must perform the H_JOIN. I have confirmed with hypervisor
development that this implies that the OS needn't involve inactive
threads in the join/suspend sequence.

It isn't quite explicit in the log for 120496ac2d2d ("powerpc: Bring all
threads online prior to migration/hibernation"), but it stands to reason
that using cede for offline is the reason that the code to online all
threads for join/suspend was introduced in the first place.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ