[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75d15d99-d8f8-c09f-e9a7-64c17d037e0e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:33:53 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support
Hi,
On 10/28/19 2:03 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> .dev_disable_feat = intel_iommu_dev_disable_feat,
>>>> .is_attach_deferred =
>>>> intel_iommu_is_attach_deferred, .pgsize_bitmap =
>>>> INTEL_IOMMU_PGSIZES, +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>>> + .sva_bind_gpasid = intel_svm_bind_gpasid,
>>>> + .sva_unbind_gpasid = intel_svm_unbind_gpasid,
>>>> +#endif
>>> again, pure PASID management logic should be separated from SVM.
>>>
>> I am not following, these two functions are SVM functionality, not
>> pure PASID management which is already separated in ioasid.c
> I should say pure "scalable mode" logic. Above callbacks are not
> related to host SVM per se. They are serving gpasid requests from
> guest side, thus part of generic scalable mode capability.
>
Currently these two callbacks are for sva only and the patch has been
queued by Joerg for the next rc1. It could be extended to be generic.
But it deserves a separated patch.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists