[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATkXYNMbquhn=SV=Hj1kqbPke8x4_a7aZYhceRAam8MHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:58:52 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource: remove useless script
Hi Julia
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:38 PM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:40:52AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > > Alexandre Belloni used
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9bbcce19c777583815c92ce3c2ff2586@www.loen.fr/
> > > as a reference, but this is not the output from coccicheck.
> > > The patch author just created a wrong patch by hand.
> >
> > Exactly. Removal of the script is a mistake. Like I said before is a healing
> > (incorrect by the way!) by symptoms.
> >
> > > The deleted semantic patch supports MODE=patch,
> > > which creates a correct patch, and is useful.
> >
> > Right!
>
> I ran it on the version of Linux that still has the script:
>
> fe7d2c23d748e4206f4bef9330d0dff9abed7411
>
> and managed to compile 341 of the generated files in the time I had
> available, and all compiled successfully.
Yeah, this semantic patch did the correct conversion
as its header part showed the confidence.
// Confidence: High
> I can let it run again, and see
> how it goes for the rest. Perhaps it would be acceptable if there was no
> report, and people would be forced to use the generated patch?
I do not think this is the right thing.
MODE=report is the default, and it is fine.
>
> If someone is writing lots of patches on this issue by hand, then perhaps
> they don't have make coccicheck to produce patches, and then would
> overlook this case completely.
>
> If it would be helpful, I could group the generated patches by maintainer
> or by subdirectory and send them out, if it would be easier to review them
> all at once.
Yes, please.
Subsystem maintainers trust you,
so I think it will make things move smoothly.
After converting most of files,
I want 283ea345934d277e30c841c577e0e2142b4bfcae reverted.
>
> Anyway, the rule is not in the kernel at the moment. For it's future, I'm
> open to whatever people find best. Personally, I prefer when same things
> are done in the same way - it makes the code easier to understand and
> makes it simpler to address other issues when they arise.
We always did the same things in the same way
except commit 283ea345934d277e30c841c577e0e2142b4bfcae
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists