[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191030084146.GE25097@grep.be>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:41:46 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...r.be>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+24c12fa8d218ed26011a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, josef@...icpanda.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...er.debian.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in nbd_ioctl
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:39:57AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:19:25PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > > Hey Josef and nbd list,
> > >
> > > I had a question about if there are any socket family restrictions for nbd?
> >
> > In normal circumstances, in userspace, the NBD protocol would only be
> > used over AF_UNIX or AF_INET/AF_INET6.
>
> Note that someone once also did work to make it work over SCTP. I
> incorporated the patch into nbd-client and nbd-server, but never
> actually tested it myself. I have no way of knowing if it even still
> works anymore...
Actually, I meant SDP (as you pointed out downthread). Sorry for the
confusion ;-)
(I should probably kick that out though, indeed)
--
To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy
-- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists