lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191030093351.GC11637@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:03:51 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        c.barrett@...mos.com, a.brela@...mos.com, peter.griffin@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] media: i2c: Add IMX296 CMOS image sensor driver

Hi Sakari,

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:35:44AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:56:34AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> > 
> > Thanks for the review!
> 
> You're welcome!
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:13:20PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Hi Manivannan,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:29:08PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +static struct i2c_driver imx296_i2c_driver = {
> > > > +	.probe_new  = imx296_probe,
> > > > +	.remove = imx296_remove,
> > > > +	.driver = {
> > > > +		.name  = "imx296",
> > > > +		.pm = &imx296_pm_ops,
> > > > +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx296_of_match),
> > > 
> > > No need for of_match_ptr here.
> > > 
> > 
> > AFAIK, of_match_ptr is needed for !OF case. Else we need to manually add
> > #ifdef clut to make it NULL. Does the situation changed now?
> 
> ACPI based systems can also make use of the compatible string for matching
> drivers with devices through of_match_table. This may sometimes be the most
> practical approach. I.e. you don't need ifdefs either.
> 

Oh okay, I'm not aware of this. Will remove of_match_ptr then.

Thanks,
Mani

> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Sakari Ailus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ