[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191030102229.GY31513@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:22:29 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@...c.org, davem@...emloft.net, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com,
chenhc@...ote.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, cai@....pw,
robin.murphy@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, dledford@...hat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@...e.de,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware
On Wed 30-10-19 11:14:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 05:34:28PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > When passing the return value of dev_to_node() to cpumask_of_node()
> > without checking if the device's node id is NUMA_NO_NODE, there is
> > global-out-of-bounds detected by KASAN.
> >
> > From the discussion [1], NUMA_NO_NODE really means no node affinity,
> > which also means all cpus should be usable. So the cpumask_of_node()
> > should always return all cpus online when user passes the node id as
> > NUMA_NO_NODE, just like similar semantic that page allocator handles
> > NUMA_NO_NODE.
> >
> > But we cannot really copy the page allocator logic. Simply because the
> > page allocator doesn't enforce the near node affinity. It just picks it
> > up as a preferred node but then it is free to fallback to any other numa
> > node. This is not the case here and node_to_cpumask_map will only restrict
> > to the particular node's cpus which would have really non deterministic
> > behavior depending on where the code is executed. So in fact we really
> > want to return cpu_online_mask for NUMA_NO_NODE.
> >
> > Also there is a debugging version of node_to_cpumask_map() for x86 and
> > arm64, which is only used when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is defined, this
> > patch changes it to handle NUMA_NO_NODE as normal node_to_cpumask_map().
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/11/66
> > Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> # MIPS bits
>
> Still:
>
> Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Do you have any other proposal that doesn't make any wild guesses about
which node to use instead of the undefined one?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists