[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC5umygBcEic4HXCWfFKj0ZJHo8RRzPkO959051eYoH7y4C39A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:29:55 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE to define
debugfs fops
2019年10月30日(水) 17:26 zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>:
>
> It is more clear to use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE to define debugfs file
> operation rather than DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> lib/fault-inject.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
> index 8186ca8..4e61326 100644
> --- a/lib/fault-inject.c
> +++ b/lib/fault-inject.c
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int debugfs_ul_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_ul, debugfs_ul_get, debugfs_ul_set, "%llu\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_ul, debugfs_ul_get, debugfs_ul_set, "%llu\n");
>
> static void debugfs_create_ul(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> struct dentry *parent, unsigned long *value)
Nowadays we have debugfs_create_ulong(), so should we use it instead of
debugfs_create_ul() defined in this file and remove the definision
altogether?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists