lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:31:49 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...rosoft.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        kys@...rosoft.com, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Hyper-V commits for 5.4-rc

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:37 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git tags/hyperv-fixes-signed
>
>No, Sasha, I'm not pulling this.
>
>It's completely broken garbage.

It is, appologies!

>You already sent me two of those fixes earlier, and they got pulled in
>commit 56c642e2aa1c ("Merge tag 'hyperv-fixes-signed' of
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyper>") two weeks ago.
>
>Fine - of the three fixes you claim, I could do this pull, and get at
>least one of them.
>
>Except YOU HAVE REBASED your branch, so I see the other two fixes that
>I already got as duplicates.
>
>WHY?

Honestly, I forgot that I sent you those two commits two weeks ago, but
still - you must be asking yourself why the heck would he rebase those,
right?

As I was working on the branch a few days ago I messed up and killed my
-fixes branch accidentally. To fix that I figured I'll just pick up
those 3 fixes again from my mailbox since they're grouped so nicely
over there and I haven't sent them to you yet.

Except that I did. And now they ended up with different IDs.

I then did a merge attempt before sending them to you, expecting that
things would blow up if I messed something up, but it didn't because the
commits themselves are identical, so I haven't noticed it then either.

Anyway, sorry about this, I'll resend it with just the relevant fix.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ