lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:00:53 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Zhong Shiqi <zhong.shiqi@....com.cn>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@....com.cn>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Xue Zhihong <xue.zhihong@....com.cn>,
        Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] coccicheck: Support search for SmPL scripts within
 selected directory hierarchy

I got the impression that you are struggling with difficulties (for unknown reasons)
around adding space characters at some places.
How would you like to improve this situation?


> *Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to search
> SmPL scripts.
>
> *Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable
> path.

* Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory
  to search SmPL scripts.

* Start a corresponding file determination if it contains
  an acceptable path.


Would you like to update the provided software documentation together with
the small extension of this bash script?

Update candidates:
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=23fdb198ae81f47a574296dab5167c5e136a02ba#n189

* https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck#controlling_which_files_are_processed_by_coccinelle


> ---

‣ Would you find the patch change log sufficient without the information
  “Changes in”?

‣ I find the specification “1:” unnecessary before a single description item.

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ