linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts:prune-kernel:prune kernel and modules dir from the system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9f7acd6-e948-4eb7-41ef-4d9a2cafe15a@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:58:56 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Cc:     bfields@...ldses.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts:prune-kernel:prune kernel and modules dir from
 the system

On 10/29/19 7:43 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 17:05 Tue 29 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
> Thank you Randy, my answers are inline , kindly look.
> 
> The modified version(implemented your suggestions) of the script and their interaction will send in next patch mail.
>>
>>
>> This patch does not delete the original script loop, so that still follows
>> after the 'done' above.  Was that intentional?
> This is confuse me! not sure  what you meant. Did you meant to say
> the do loop inside does not match with this pair???

I mean that the old loop that begins with
for f in "$@"

is still there after your patch.


-- 
~Randy