linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: memcontrol: remove mem_cgroup_select_victim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:06:58 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+13f93c99c06988391efe@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: memcontrol: remove
 mem_cgroup_select_victim_node()

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-10-19 13:44:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Also, I think we should use sc.gfp_mask & ~__GFP_THISNODE, so that
> > allocations with a physical node preference still do node-agnostic
> > reclaim for the purpose of cgroup accounting.
> 
> Do not we exclude that by GFP_RECLAIM_MASK already?

My bad, you're right. Scratch that, then. Thanks.