[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191030193129.GA32308@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:31:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com, bristot@...hat.com,
longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/percpu_rwsem: Rewrite to not use rwsem
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:52:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -58,16 +72,17 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> -static inline int percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> +static inline bool percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> - int ret = 1;
> + bool ret = true;
>
> preempt_disable();
> /*
> * Same as in percpu_down_read().
> */
> - __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
> - if (unlikely(!rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
> + if (likely(!rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
That should obviously also loose the !
> + __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
> + else
> ret = __percpu_down_read(sem, true); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
> preempt_enable();
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists