[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB5749158C2EBD47FC48A79FF286600@BYAPR04MB5749.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:58:32 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] nvmet: Always remove processed AER elements from list
On 10/30/2019 08:24 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got following oops:
>
> PID: 79413 TASK: ffff92f03a814ec0 CPU: 19 COMMAND: "kworker/19:2"
> #0 [ffffa5308b8c3c58] machine_kexec at ffffffff8e05dd02
> #1 [ffffa5308b8c3ca8] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8e12102a
> #2 [ffffa5308b8c3d68] crash_kexec at ffffffff8e122019
> #3 [ffffa5308b8c3d80] oops_end at ffffffff8e02e091
> #4 [ffffa5308b8c3da0] general_protection at ffffffff8e8015c5
> [exception RIP: nvmet_async_event_work+94]
> RIP: ffffffffc0d9a80e RSP: ffffa5308b8c3e58 RFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: dead000000000100 RBX: ffff92dcbc7464b0 RCX: 0000000000000002
> RDX: 0000000000040002 RSI: 38ffff92dc9814cf RDI: ffff92f217722f20
> RBP: ffff92dcbc746418 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 0000000000000000
> R10: 000000000000035b R11: ffff92efb8dd2091 R12: ffff92dcbc7464a0
> R13: ffff92dbe03a5f29 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0ffff92f92f26864
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> #5 [ffffa5308b8c3e78] process_one_work at ffffffff8e0a3b0c
> #6 [ffffa5308b8c3eb8] worker_thread at ffffffff8e0a41e7
> #7 [ffffa5308b8c3f10] kthread at ffffffff8e0a93af
> #8 [ffffa5308b8c3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff8e800235
>
> this maps to nvmet_async_event_results. So it looks like this function
> access a stale aen pointer:
>
> static u32 nvmet_async_event_result(struct nvmet_async_event *aen)
> {
> return aen->event_type | (aen->event_info << 8) | (aen->log_page << 16);
> }
Can you please explain the test setup ? Is that coming from the tests
present in the blktests ? if so you can please provide test number ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists