[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3535726.AjB5hMM71F@sven-edge>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:00:21 +0100
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc,
b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] batman-adv: Simplify 'batadv_v_ogm_aggr_list_free()'
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 08:42:55 CET Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Use 'skb_queue_purge()' instead of re-implementing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Consider this patch applied. I just have to leave now and thus I will only
apply after my return.
> ---
> BTW, I don't really see the need of 'aggr_list_lock'. I think that the code
> could be refactored to drop 'aggr_list_lock' and use the already existing
> 'aggr_list.lock'.
> This would require to use the lock-free __skb_... variants when working on
> 'aggr_list'.
>
> As far as I understand, the use of 'aggr_list' and 'aggr_list_lock' is
> limited to bat_v_ogm.c'. So the impact would be limited.
> This would avoid a useless locking that never fails, so the performance
> gain should be really limited.
>
> So, I'm not sure this would be more readable and/or future proof, so
> I just note it here to open the discussion.
>
> If interested, I have a (compiled tested only) patch that implements this
> change.
Yes, please send it over.
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists