linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] media: hantro: Use capture buffer width and height for H264 decoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191031102102.63afd4e5@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:21:02 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] media: hantro: Use capture buffer width and
 height for H264 decoding

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:24:50 +0000
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se> wrote:

> Calculations for motion vector buffer offset is based on width and height
> from the configured capture format, lets use the same values for macroblock
> width and height hw regs.
> 
> Fixes: dea0a82f3d22 ("media: hantro: Add support for H264 decoding on G1")
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - new patch split from "media: hantro: Fix H264 motion vector buffer offset"
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g1_h264_dec.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g1_h264_dec.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g1_h264_dec.c
> index 71bf162eaf73..eeed11366135 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g1_h264_dec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g1_h264_dec.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static void set_params(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
>  	vdpu_write_relaxed(vpu, reg, G1_REG_DEC_CTRL0);
>  
>  	/* Decoder control register 1. */
> -	reg = G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1_PIC_MB_WIDTH(sps->pic_width_in_mbs_minus1 + 1) |
> -	      G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1_PIC_MB_HEIGHT_P(sps->pic_height_in_map_units_minus1 + 1) |
> +	reg = G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1_PIC_MB_WIDTH(MB_WIDTH(ctx->dst_fmt.width)) |
> +	      G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1_PIC_MB_HEIGHT_P(MB_HEIGHT(ctx->dst_fmt.height)) |

I'm just curious, do they differ in practice? Also not sure what's been
decided for the "G1 post-proc", but if the dst/capture format res set
by the user is the scaled res (PP can scale IIRC), then you probably
shouldn't use those values here.

>  	      G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1_REF_FRAMES(sps->max_num_ref_frames);
>  	vdpu_write_relaxed(vpu, reg, G1_REG_DEC_CTRL1);
>