[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191031094837.wy4gj6xo4youao75@hendrix>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:48:37 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
jernej.skrabec@...l.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM64: dts: sun50i-h6-pine-h64: state that the DT
supports the modelB
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:24:13PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The current sun50i-h6-pine-h64 DT does not specify which model (A or B)
> it supports.
> When this file was created, only modelA was existing, but now both model
> exists and with the time, this DT drifted to support the model B since it is
> the most common one.
> Furtheremore, some part of the model A does not work with it like ethernet and
> HDMI connector (as confirmed by Jernej on IRC).
>
> So it is time to settle the issue, and the easiest way is to state that
> this DT is for model B.
No, this DT was introduced for model A, and we have to keep that. If
some model B changes crept in, that's unfortunate, but it should be
reverted, instead of changing the assumptions like this.
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists