[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c525f66c1c0d9f07e0cff4948d1ec3229756220.camel@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:30:36 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, mbrugger@...e.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, wahrenst@....net,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a
variable
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 14:49 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 08:31:03PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Some architectures, notably ARM, are interested in tweaking this
> > depending on their runtime DMA addressing limitations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
>
> Do you want me to pick this up for the 5.5 dma-mapping tree, or do you
> want me to wait for the rest to settle?
I'd say take it, this will be ultimately needed once we push forward with ARM.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists