lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gSz1Pk=7u0s-cgjc9_0ibCyA6RNCcVHw7+GLWWoCj22g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 22:08:58 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] Power management fix for v5.4-rc6

Hi Linus,

Please pull from the tag

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
 pm-5.4-rc6

with top-most commit e82b7457909afd2e973ebd251ad79945d04ca376

 Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq'

on top of commit 767d2d710e9066c47919a4e5f05a21e1ad40ddc4

 Merge branches 'pm-cpuidle' and 'pm-opp'

to receive a power management fix for 5.4-rc6.

This fixes a recently introduced (mostly theoretical) issue that the
requests to confine the maximum CPU frequency coming from the platform
firmware may not be taken into account if multiple CPUs are covered
by one cpufreq policy on a system with ACPI.

Thanks!


---------------

Rafael J. Wysocki (1):
      ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs

---------------

 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ