[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46754b8f-ed86-f622-0f9a-0fc1ffb2cb0c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 00:09:03 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"graf@...zon.com" <graf@...zon.com>,
"jschoenh@...zon.de" <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
"karahmed@...zon.de" <karahmed@...zon.de>,
"rimasluk@...zon.com" <rimasluk@...zon.com>,
"Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] kvm: x86: ioapic: Lazy update IOAPIC EOI
On 31/10/19 16:17, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> What if we change kvm->arch.apicv_state to kvm->arch.apicv_disable_mask
> and have each bit representing the reason for deactivating APICv.
>
> For example:
> #define APICV_DISABLE_MASK_IRQWIN 0
> #define APICV_DISABLE_MASK_HYPERV 1
> #define APICV_DISABLE_MASK_PIT_REINJ 2
> #define APICV_DISABLE_MASK_NESTED 3
>
> In this case, we activate APICv only if kvm->arch.apicv_disable_mask ==
> 0. This way, we can find out why APICv is deactivated on a particular VM
> at a particular point in time.
Yes, that also works for me if it makes for an easier implementation.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists