[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191031162825.a545a5d4d8567368501769bd@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:28:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: sysctl: make drop_caches write-only
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:16:02 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> Currently, the drop_caches proc file and sysctl read back the last
> value written, suggesting this is somehow a stateful setting instead
> of a one-time command. Make it write-only, like e.g. compact_memory.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .procname = "drop_caches",
> .data = &sysctl_drop_caches,
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> - .mode = 0644,
> + .mode = 0200,
> .proc_handler = drop_caches_sysctl_handler,
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> .extra2 = &four,
hm.
Risk: some (odd) userspace code will break. Fixable by manually chmodding
it back again.
Reward: very little.
Is the reward worth the risk?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists