[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191101091355.ibbet6a2zb23bpjn@hendrix>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:13:55 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sun4i: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to simplify the code
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:09:39PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> It is better to use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> index d0a8d58..72012a6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> @@ -1174,10 +1174,8 @@ static int sun4i_i2s_init_regmap_fields(struct device *dev,
> i2s->field_fmt_sr =
> devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, i2s->regmap,
> i2s->variant->field_fmt_sr);
> - if (IS_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr))
> - return PTR_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr);
>
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(i2s->field_fmt_sr);
I don't find it "better". This couples the error handling and the
success case, and it makes it harder to extend in the future.
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists